A single-paragraph order denies bail to the petitioner, Jagdish Mahto, who is in custody for alleged offences under the Arms Act and related statutes. The court cites his criminal antecedents and the nature of allegations as grounds for rejection.
Prayer for bail rejected as a discretion due to criminal antecedents and nature of the allegations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32376 of 2013 (2) dt.02-08-2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32376 of 2013
====================================================== Jagdish Mahto, son of Devanand Mahto, r/o. village Parwarpur, P.S.Arwal, Dist.Arwal, .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Pd. Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.K.Singh No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 02-08-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32376 of 2013 (2) dt.02-08-2013
2
Arms Act this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner and the prayer for bail is rejected.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, with criminal antecedents and facing serious charges under the Arms Act, is entitled to bail?
Whether the allegation of false implication and non-recovery of the weapon influences the decision on bail?
Jagdish Mahto
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
