Allowed
Jagat Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./2845/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2845 of 2013
====================================================== Jagat Kumar .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-02-2013 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner did not supply information under The R.T.I. Act to one Rajesh Kumar within stipulated time. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for non-supply of information under The R.T.I. Act, there is stipulated procedure when no offence is made out as alleged. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No. 38 of 2012 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2845 of 2013 (2) dt.14-02-2013
2 / 2
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Jehanabad,
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./-
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Jagat Kumar
The State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court