Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner facing allegations under IPC Sections 406 and 418 in a fraud case involving non-provision of employment and non-return of funds.
Petitioner released on anticipatory bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26906 of 2013
====================================================== Shamima Begum .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-10-2013 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 418 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that the petitioner realized Rs. 25,000/- for providing employment to the complainant but neither the employment was provided nor the money was returned.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during investigation, the accusation was found false and final form was submitted but subsequently on protest, the cognizance has been taken when petitioner’s side filed complaint against the complainant prior in time. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26906 of 2013 (2) dt.03-10-2013
2/2
weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabhua in connection with Complaint Case No. 1254 of 2008, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Amrendra/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the facts disclosed by the petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shamima Begum
The State Of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
