Oral order allowing the withdrawal of the appeal by the petitioner as he had already been acquitted in the case, rendering the application infructuous. The appeal was dismissed as not pressed forward.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14752 of 2013 (3) dt.03-10-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14752 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Tempu Yadav S/O Madan Yadav Resident Of Village- Ghaghanpati, P.S- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A. Haque, APP ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER |
|
| 3 | 03-10-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to |
| withdraw his application by stating that the petitioner has already | |
| been acquitted in this case. That being so, this application has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed, as not pressed. |
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/-
Tempu Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Mihir Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
