Allowed

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2013CR. MISC./11161/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted provisional bail to the petitioner under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act and Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Release was conditional on furnishing a bond and complying with religious and reporting requirements to the Head Priest of a local temple.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail granted subject to bond of Rs. 5,000, surety conditions, and reporting to Head Priest within fifteen days for a six-month period.

Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11161 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== Ravi Kumar, S/o Kamal Singh.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶4

23.04.2013

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶6

State.

¶7

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 47(A) of the Excise Act and Sections 25(1-B) A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶8

Considering that arms were not recovered from the conscious possession of the Petitioner but from his house and has fair antecedents as also his brother, Birendra Kumar undertakes his responsibility, let the Petitioner, above named be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 64 of 2012 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other bailor shall be the brother of the Petitioner

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11161 of 2013 (2) dt.23-04-2013

¶10

¶11

namely Birendra Kumar. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶12

In the nature of allegations to obviate further possibility of implication in other criminal matters, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Head Priest of Local Temple, Jehanabad within fifteen days of his release and file a certificate about the same in the Court. On filing of the certificate the petitioner will be granted provisional bail for a period of six months. In case, the

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11161 of 2013 (2) dt.23-04-2013

¶14

¶15

petitioner does not file a certificate about his reporting to the Head Priest within two weeks of his release from jail custody, he shall be noticed cancellation of bail. During six months the petitioner is expected to engage himself in fruitful activities under the guidance of the Head Priest, Local Temple, Jehanabad and at the end of the six months, he will file a certificate of his conduct in the court below issued by the Head Priest. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is found satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner and in case it is not, the petitioner will be taken in custody.

¶16

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶17

Vikash/-

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vipul Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhano Rishideo Vs The State Of Bihar

Jagdish Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kailu Singh @ Hare Ram Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kuraisa Khatoon @ Kresha Khatoon @ Bibi Kuresha Vs The State Of Bihar