by this court on bail on 28.08.2001 and, therefore, it is apparent that appellant has already remained in jail custody for more than three years. Furthermore, in course of trial of the appellant, no material was brought on behalf of the prosecution to show that prior to the alleged occurrence the appellant was involved in similar type of activities and even after conviction as well as filing of this appeal nothing has been brought on the record to show this fact that after being released on bail by this Court the appellant indulged himself in similar type of activities. Admittedly, the ganja has been recovered from the house and not from the conscious possession of the appellant. Moreover, at the time of occurrence, appellant was aged about 25 years and it appears that he was junior member of his family. Therefore, in the aforesaid circumstance, in my view, the learned counsel for the appellant rightly submitted that the period already undergone by the appellant shall meet the ends of justice, but so far as imposition of fine is concerned, I think it proper to reduce the aforesaid amount and accordingly, I am of the opinion that ends of justice will meet, if the appellant is sentenced to period already undergone by him and the fine amount is reduced up to rupees twenty five thousand. Accordingly, he is sentenced to period already undergone by him in course of trial as well as during pendency of this appeal and Rs. 25,000/- is imposed upon him as fine and in default of payment of
