Allowed the writ application to quash two specific notices relating to land. The matter was remitted to the Circle Officer to provide a fresh hearing opportunity to both petitioners and respondent No.5.
Annexure 6 and 8 quashed; matter remitted to Circle Officer, Sasaram, for a fresh hearing opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8913 of 1993
In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
======================================================
All residents of village – Tilanthu, P S – Tilanthu, District - Rohtas
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. VINAY KIRTI SINGH
Mr. Akhileshwar Singh
For the Respondent State : Mr. (GP 6)
====================================================== CORAM: HON`BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT
When this matter was admitted on 10.9.1993 a status quo order with regard to the land in question was passed. Today when the matter is taken up there is none to represent respondent No.5. Counsel for the State however is present.
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8913 of 1993 dt.05-10-2012
2 / 2
establish their claim or right which they are seeking through the writ court by seeking quashing of Annexure 6 and 8.
10.12.1990 and 8.7.1993 respectively, are quashed.
who shall give a fresh opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as respondent no.5.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Patna High Court: The 5th October,2012 R.K.Pathak/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ application to quash notices dated 10.12.1990 and 8.7.1993 should be allowed.
Whether the parties must be given a fresh opportunity of hearing on the land dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakshman Ram and others
The State of Bihar and others
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
