In an oral order, the Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution, observing the petitioner had not appeared despite an interim direction granted as early as 1993.
Writ application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8306 of 1993 (4) dt.04-10-2012
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8306 of 1993 ====================================================== |
|---|
Umarawati Devi wife of Shri Kameshwar Sharma, Assistant Teacher, Government Nawin Madhya Vidyalay, Rajbanshi Nagar, P.S. Shastrinagar, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None |
| For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Sc4) ====================================================== |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER |
| 4 04-10-2012 None appears for the petitioner on call. Since |
| there was already an interim direction in favour of the petitioner as |
| far back as in 1993, petitioner seems to have lost interest over a |
| period of time. She could have superannuated also in the meantime. |
| Be that as it may, this writ application is dismissed for non prosecution. |
| Amin/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition should be disposed of for default due to non-appearance
Whether the petitioner still has a live cause of action for the relief sought
Umarawati Devi
State & Ors
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
