A police inspector filed a writ petition claiming discrimination in promotion selection compared to seniors. The Patna High Court directed the Respondents to treat the petitioner equally with similarly situated junior personnel.
Directed Respondents to grant the petitioner the same treatment as similarly situated persons within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2771 of 2011 (3) dt.21-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2771 of 2011
====================================================== 1. Raghuvansh Prasad Lt. Jag Narain Ram Shital Tola, P.S. Town, Distt. Bhojpur, at present posted as Inspector of Police, Special Branch Tarapur, District Munger
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambasta GP14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA ORAL ORDER
Writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.
(Prakash Chandra Verma, J)
mrl-
Patna High Court CWJC No.2771 of 2011 (3) dt.21-09-2012
1 issue framed by the court
Whether similarly situated persons junior to the petitioner on the seniority list should receive the same promotion consideration.
Raghuvansh Prasad Lt.
The State Of Bihar Through The Director, General Of Police, Bihar, Patna
The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna
The Additional D.G.P. Special Branch, Bihar, Patna
The Inspector General Of Police ( H.Qr. And Admn.) Bihar, Patna
The D.I.G. ( Headquarter), Bihar, Patna
Prakash Chandra Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
