Allowed

Suryadeshwar Pandey and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC21 Sept 2012CWJC/17823/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal against an order dismissing the writ petition was allowed. The High Court directed the appellate authority to reconsider the matter considering school registers and allowed the elected Committee of Management to continue.

What did the court decide?

The appellate authority was directed to reconsider the matter using school registers; the elected Committee of Management was allowed to continue; writ petition disposed of.

Suryadeshwar Pandey and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar… — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17823 of 2010

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Suryadeshwar Pandey S/O Late Baij Nath Pandey R/O Vill.- Nad, P.S.Baddi (Shiv Sagar), Distt.- Rohtas, At Present H.M. Of Sanatan Dharam Sanskrit High School, Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas

¶4

Balram Singh S/O Late Bansidhar Singh R/O Vill.- Gurudawara Purakarn Sarai, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas

¶5

.... .... Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

The Principal Secretary Human Resources Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶9

The Special Director (Secondary Education) Govt. Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna

¶10

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna

¶11

The Secretary Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna

¶12

The District Education Officer, Rohtas

¶13

Nirmal Narain Dubey @ Vijay Narayan Dubey S/O Sri Ram Dubey R/O Vill.- Terari, P.O.- Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas

¶14

Smt. Radhika Devi W/O Nirmal Narayan Dubey @ Bijay Narayan Dubey R/O Vill.- Terari, P.O. And P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas

¶15

.... .... Respondents

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Subhash Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP2)

¶17

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶18

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the register which contains the minutes of the meeting, the appellate authority is directed to reconsider the matter taking into account the evidence in the registers maintained by the school concerned containing the minutes of the general body by which the Committee of Management was elected, and the elected body shall be allowed to continue. The school shall file the register and notices shall be issued to all the parties concerned by the appellate

¶19

2 21-09-2012

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.17823 of 2010 (2) dt.21-09-2012

¶21

¶22

authority.

¶23

Writ petition is disposed of.

¶24

(Prakash Chandra Verma, J) mrl./-

Suryadeshwar Pandey and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suryadeshwar Pandey and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudarshan Sahani Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Mithilesh Kumar Singh @ Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Arabind Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Prasad Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Raghuvansh Prasad Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.