This Court disposed of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking supervision over orders in a title suit and appellate proceedings regarding the rejection of an appointment of receiver prayer.
Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16038 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Tiwari, Adv. For the Respondent/s: ……………..
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.16038 of 2012 (2) dt.17-10-2012
2 / 2
40 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been rejected.
There being a concurrent finding by the Court of facts, no interference is called for by this Court in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction and this application is accordingly disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
Bibhash/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere under Article 227 in view of concurrent findings of facts by lower courts.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shekh Anwarul
Raj Govind Choudhary
Mahendra Sahani
Yamuna Sahani
Awadhesh Sahani
Rajbanshi Choudhary
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
