The Patna High Court granted permission to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging an FIR, dismissing the petition as withdrawn. The court preserved the liberty to raise points at the appropriate trial stage.
Permission for withdrawal of the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5436 of 2011 (3) dt.19-09-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5436 of 2011
| ====================================================== Pramod Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar And Ors. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Many, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.K.Pandey, APP |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER |
|
| 3 | 19-09-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the |
| State. | |
| In this case the petitioner is challenging the FIR of | |
| Nao Kothi P.S.Case No. 66 of 2010 instituted for offences under | |
| Sections 667, 668, 471, 420 and 414 IPC. | |
| After some argument, counsel for the petitioner | |
| wants to withdraw this petition. Permission is accorded and this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the points at |
|
| the appropriate stage of trial. |
Jay/-
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Pramod Singh
The State Of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
