Allowed

Tetar Manjhi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2012CR. MISC./44818/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants bail to five petitioners member of the same family in a criminal case instituted under Sections 147, 341, 323, and 307 of the Indian Penal Code at Gaya. The court directed their release on furnishing a bond of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties of similar amount.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount after deposit.

Tetar Manjhi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2012) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No 44818 of 2012

¶3

====================================================== 1 Tetar Manjhi, son of Sakun Manjhi 2 Amrish Manjhi 3 Rajesh Manjhi 4 Sanjay Manjhi, 5 Birju Manjhi, sons of Tetar Manjhi, resident of village – Bhadejee, Bhue Tola, PS – Mufassil, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH

¶4

ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 17-12-2012 Five petitioners, being members of the same family, apprehend arrest in Gaya Mufassil Police Station Case No 68 of 2012 instituted under Sections 147, 341, 323, 307 of Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the learned Sessions Court has noted in the order that as per injury report, the injured Anup Manjhi was found to have suffered fracture of the left temporal bone, there is no such injury as per injury report. The doctor in fact has found the injuries to be simple. The injury report of the said injured has been annexed as Annexure 3. It clearly mentions that the injuries are simple and there is no mention of fracture.

¶7

Be that as it may, from the reading of the first information report, it appears that there was quarrel in between

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44818 of 2012 (2) dt.17-12-2012

¶9

¶10

two group of persons who had been earlier quarreling on a piece of land in which scuffle took place and injuries were caused.

¶11

In the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender, the petitioners abovenamed are directed to be released on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in Mufassil Police Station Case No 68 of 2012 subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code.

¶12

M.E.H. /- (Navaniti Prasad Singh)

Tetar Manjhi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tetar Manjhi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Devendra Singh and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Raju Kumar Vidyarthi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Govind Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Sudesh Kaur and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Dubey Vs The State Of Bihar

Satish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar