Single-judge order adjourning a writ petition regarding delayed decision on appointment as Anganbari Supervisor. The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to decide the case within six weeks without expressing an opinion on merits.
Directed Divisional Commissioner, Purnea, to decide petitioner's appointment claim within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.3611 of 2011 Sweta Kumari Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------- 2 8.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is yet another writ application in which the application of the petitioner on the issue of appointment on the post of Anganbari Supervisor has not been decided since January, 2011. Annexure-4 is the application of the petitioner filed in this
regard.
Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the claim, let the Divisional Commissioner, Purnea decide the case of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the date of production/communication of a copy of this order. This writ application is disposed of with the above direction. RPS (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Divisional Commissioner, Purnea, should decide the petitioner's appointment claim promptly.
Whether this writ application allows merits to be decided without expressing an opinion.
Sweta Kumari
The State Of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
