Disposed¶27

Jhansirani Parida v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC7 Apr 2025WP(C)/1937/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Orissa High Court, Cuttack; W.P.(C) No. 1937 of 2025; petitioner Jhansirani Parida; opposite parties State of Odisha and Another; counsel Suresh Chandra Pradhan; Savitri Ratho, J.; order dated 04.04.2025; digital record; date chart dated 13.01.2025 flagged at Flag 'A'; date chart filed 03.04.2025 not in digital record; order dated 02.04.2025 not incorporated; Dealing Assistant and scanning in charge to submit explanations; next listing 07.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim directions: the concerned Dealing Assistant and scanning in charge directed to submit explanations for the digital-record lapses; matter listed for further hearing on 07.04.2025. ¶27

Jhansirani Parida Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interim directions: the concerned Dealing Assistant and scanning in charge directed to submit explanations for the digital-record lapses; matter listed for further hearing on 07.04.2025.

¶27

Issue for consideration

Whether the date chart filed on 03.04.2025 pursuant to the order dated 02.04.2025 was received and incorporated in the digital record. +1 more

¶15

Court's answer

The list of dates and events flagged at Flag 'A' is the date chart dated 13.01.2025, and the date chart filed on 03.04.2025 pursuant to the order dated 02.04.2025 is not available in the digital record.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

From this it appears that the concerned Dealing Assistant or the scanning team has/have been careless by (i) not incorporating the order dated 02.04.2025 in the digital record, (ii) not updating the note sheet, and (iii) flag marking the earlier list of dates and events instead of the list uploaded the previous day.

¶22

Key takeaways

As the negligence of the concerned Dealing Assistant/scanning team has resulted in wastage of the Court's time, the concerned Dealing Assistant and scanning in charge shall submit explanations.ratio¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Order dated 04.04.2025 of Hon'ble Miss Justice Savitri Ratho, High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, in W.P.(C) No. 1937 of 2025 (Jhansirani Parida v. State of Odisha and Another): administrative/interim order. Although the cause list noted the petitioner's list of dates and events at Flag 'A', the flagged document was found to be the date chart dated 13.01.2025; the date chart filed on 03.04.2025 pursuant to the order dated 02.04.2025 was not available in the digital record, and that order itself had not been incorporated therein. Concluding that the concerned Dealing Assistant or the scanning team appeared careless (non-incorporation of the order, note sheet not updated, earlier list flagged instead of the fresh one), the Court required the concerned Dealing Assistant and scanning in charge to submit explanations and listed the matter on 07.04.2025. No substantive issue of law was decided.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

*** W.P.(C)** CMP No. 1937 of 2025

¶3

Jhansirani Parida

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr. Suresh Chandra Pradhan, Advocate -versus-

¶6

State of Odisha and Another ….. Opposite Parties CORAM:

¶7

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

04.04.2025

Order No.

(Through hybrid Mode)

¶12

02 01.

¶13

On 02.04.2025, this case was adjourned to today to enable Mr.

¶14

* corrected Suresh Chandra Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner vide order dated 07.04.2025. appearing from the virtual High Court at Kendrapara to file a properly constituted date chart.

¶15

On 02.04.2025, the Registry has been directed to download the date chart which the counsel for the petitioner had undertaken to file on 03.04.2025 and incorporate it in the digital record. However, no noting is available in the digital record regarding receipt of this date chart. As there was a noting in the cause list that the list of dates and events filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner is at Flag ‘A’, the same was perused.

¶16

Perusal of the digital record reveals that the order dated 02.04.2025 has not been incorporated in the digital record for which

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

the order was downloaded from the website in the Court and perused.

¶19

Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶20

the date chart has been uploaded at 10.00 A.M. yesterday i.e. 03.04.2025.

¶21

But repeated perusal of the list of dates and events at Flag ‘A’ reveals that it is the date chart dated 13.01.2025 and the date chart filed yesterday pursuant to order dated 02.04.2025 is not available in the digital record.

¶22

From this, it appears that either the concerned Dealing Assistant or the scanning team has/have been careless by (i) not incorporating the order dated 02.04.2025 in the digital record (ii) not

¶23

updating the note sheet in the digital record; and (iii) flag marking the list of dates and events filed earlier along with the writ petition instead of the list uploaded yesterday.

¶24

As the negligence of the concerned Dealing Assistant/

¶25

scanning team has resulted in wastage of time of this Court, the concerned Dealing Assistant and scanning in charge shall submit explanations.

¶26

Signature Not Verified8.

¶27

List this matter on 07.04.2025.

¶28

Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court puspa Date: 10-Apr-2025 18:27:21

¶29

(Savitri Ratho) Judge

¶30

Page 2 of 2

Jhansirani Parida v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jhansirani Parida v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kankadajodi Cooperative Society, Cuttack Vs State of Odisha

Prasant Swain Vs Collector and District Magistrate, Kendrapara

Dulei Dehuri Vs State of Odisha

Bijaya Kumar Bhoi Vs State of Odisha

Odisha Rastrabhasa Parishad,Puri Vs Inspector General of Registration Board of Revenue, Cuttack

Maheswar Naik Vs Sudhakar Naik