Petitioners sought bail in a case registered under BNS sections. The police affidavit revealed the dispute was civil in nature. The Court dismissed the petition, directing petitioners to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.440 of 2025
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. S.J. Mohanty, Addl. P.P.
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
13.10.2025
in connection with the earlier FIR filed by the father of the Petitioner, namely, Raja Sahu which was registered as Muribahal P.S. Case No.80 of 2025 dated 08.04.2025 under Sections 126(2)/296/351/-(2)/3(5) BNS. Upon the detailed investigation by the investigating agency, it appears that the matter in question relates to civil dispute.
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge
KC Bisoi
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KRUSHNA CHANDRA BISOI Reason: Authentication Location: orissa high court Date: 14-Oct-2025 14:21:33
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail in view of the police investigation revealing the matter is a civil dispute?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Damodar Sahu
another
State of Odisha
others
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
