Old writ petition from 2011; counsel stated he had no instructions in the matter. The court disposed of the writ petition for want of instructions, leaving the petitioner liberty to pursue any appropriate legal remedy if a cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 28009 of 2011
Sasmita Mishra …. Petitioner
Represented by Mr. D. Routray, Advocate -Versus -
State of Orissa and others …. Opposite Parties Represented by AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_ 28.08.2024
Order No.
6.
( Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge
B.C. Tudu Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 29-Aug-2024 19:19:52
Page 1 of 1
Sasmita Mishra
State of Orissa
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
