Counsel for the petitioner in this 2008 writ petition stated he had no instructions. The High Court disposed of the petition for want of instructions, granting liberty to seek appropriate legal remedy if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 12070 of 2008
Lalita Mahanta …. Petitioner
Represented by Mr. K.K. Swain, Advocate
-Versus -
Collector-cum-CEO, Zilla Parishad, Keonjhar
….
Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
28.08.2024
Order No. 12.
matter of the year 2008 and he has no instructions in the matter.
( Sashikanta Mishra)
Judge
B.C. Tudu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 29-Aug-2024 19:19:52
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition of 2008 should be disposed of when counsel has no instructions in the matter.
Lalita Mahanta
Collector-cum-CEO, Zilla Parishad, Keonjhar
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
