Petitioner sought withdrawal of a civil petition due to the Respondent's liquidation under CIRP. The High Court of Orissa allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the case; COPET dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK COPET No.16 of 2015
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited …. Petitioner
Represented By Adv.
Mr. Tapesh Roy
-versus-
…. Coastal Projects Ltd., Opposite Parties Bhubaneswar
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order No.
09.05.2024
1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner files a memo stating therein that since the Opposite Party/Company is under liquidation through CIRP process, the Petitioner does not want to pursue the case. Hence, the Petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw this COPET. Memo filed be kept on record.
3. Accordingly, the COPET is dismissed as withdrawn.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMITRA NAYAKDesignation: Jr. Stenographer (Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Judge Date: 13-May-2024 16:36:51 Sumitra
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi)
Page 1 of 1
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
