A contempt petition alleged violation of an order dated 24.03.2009 concerning disposal of a representation. The Court found the representation had been disposed of and no deliberate disobedience was made out, dropping the contempt proceedings while leaving the petitioner free to challenge the representation order elsewhere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 2403 of 2009
Purusottam Nath …. Petitioner
Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty-1, Advocate
-versus-
…. Saurabh Garg, I.A.S., Secretary to Opposite Party Government of Orissa, Department of Public Enterprises
Ms. Saswata Patnaik, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
14.05.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
Signature Not Verified
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
Digitally Signed S. Behera Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 15-May-2024 10:40:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was deliberate disobedience of the Court's order dated 24.03.2009 warranting contempt proceedings.
Purusottam Nath
Saurabh Garg, I.A.S., Secretary to Government of Orissa, Department of Public Enterprises
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
