In a contempt petition alleging violation of a 2009 order, the High Court of Orissa held that no case for deliberate disobedience was established. The proceeding was dropped.
Contempt proceedings dropped; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge the disposal of his representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 2368 of 2009
Rama Ch. Pradhan …. Petitioner
Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty-1, Advocate
-versus-
…. Saurabh Garg, I.A.S., Secretary to Opposite Party Government of Orissa, Department of Public Enterprises
Ms. Saswata Patnaik, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
Order No.
14.05.2024
This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
Signature Not Verified
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh)
Chief Justice
Digitally Signed S. Behera Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 15-May-2024 10:40:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a case of deliberate disobedience of the Court's order was made out in the contempt petition.
Rama Ch. Pradhan
Saurabh Garg
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
