Petition challenging rejection of an application to amend a written statement in a civil suit. Counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition to pursue remedies under law; the High Court disposed of the CMP as withdrawn, deciding no substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 21-Jun-2024 14:13:31
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP NO.362 OF 2024 Gourahari Suna ….
…. Petitioner
Mr. Alok Kumar Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Jagyaseni Suna and another …. Opp. Parties
Order No.
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER 20.06.2024
learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhawanipatna in CS No.105 of 2019 is under challenge in this CMP, whereby an application filed by the Defendant No.1-Petitoner for amendment of the written statement, has been rejected.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Rojalin
Page 1 of 1
Gourahari Suna
Jagyaseni Suna
another
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
