Dismissed¶21

M/S. Sankar Saw Mill, Jajpur v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC19 Jun 2024WP(C)/7299/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Saw mill rehabilitation land allotment Odisha; mandamus against Chief General Manager (MSME) IDCO and Principal Chief Conservator of Forests; restraint on meeting dated 19.10.2023 recommendation and State Level Recommendation list (Annexures-2 and 3); writ petition W.P.(C) 7299/2024 dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's prayer with memo; single-judge order dated 19.06.2024; no merits adjudication.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request, with a withdrawal memo filed in Court taken on record. ¶21

M/S. Sankar Saw Mill, Jajpur Vs State of Odisha — Orissa HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) NO. 7299 OF 2024

¶3

M/s. Sankar Saw Mill, Jajpur

¶4

…. Petitioner

¶5

Mr. Subas Chandra Das, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

State of Odisha and others

¶8

…. Opp. Parties Mr. Amiya Kumar Mishra, Additional Government Advocate

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER

Order No.

19.06.2024

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶15

This writ petition has been filed with the following

¶16

prayer:

¶17

“ The petitioner therefore pray that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ application and issue a Rule NISI calling upon the opp. Parties to file their show cause as to why this Writ application shall not be allowed and after hearing counsel from both sides this Hon'ble Court kindly issue a Writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Chief General Manager(MSME)IDCO, At- IDCO Tower, Janpath, Bhubaneswar Dist- Khurdha i.e. the Opp Party No.2 and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, AtAranya Bhawan, P.O/P.S- Bhubaneswar, DistKhordha i.e. Opp. Party No. 3 for allotment of land for Rehabilitation of the petitioner's saw mill within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court for the ends of justice and equity;.

¶18

And/or direction may be given to the Opp. Party No.2 and 3 not to take any action on the recommendation of the meeting dated 19.10.2023 under Annexure-2 and the State Level Recommendation list under Annexure-3 of the Writ petition till decision for Rehabilitation of petitioner's Saw mill is taken for the ends of justice and equity;

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

And/ or any other pass any other order/orders, direction/directions may be issued to as to give complete relief to the petitioner; And for which act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound, ever pray.”

¶21

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. In support of his contention, he files a memo in Court, which is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶22

bks

¶23

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

¶24

Signature Not Verified

¶25

Digitally Signed Signed by: BIJAY KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 20-Jun-2024 11:27:12

¶26

Page 2 of 2

M/S. Sankar Saw Mill, Jajpur v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Sankar Saw Mill, Jajpur v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Debasmita Sahoo Vs Ranjan Kumar Sahoo

Biswarupa Padhi Vs Simanchal Maharana

Manjushree Dash Vs State of Odisha

Chandrika Priyadarshini Vs State of Odisha

M/S. Laxmi Saw Mill, Jajpur Vs State of Odisha

Manaranjan Mohanta Vs State of Odisha