Anticipatory bail application by a person accused of cheating and allied offences in connection with a Cuttack police case. The petitioner filed an affidavit regarding ownership and non-availability of a vehicle. The court declined anticipatory bail considering the nature of the offence and allegations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.281 of 2024
Rajesh Kumar Baral
Mr. R.J. Pani, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. Shashanka Patra, ASC Mr. K.C. Nayak, Adv. for Informant
CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
12.03.2024
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
vehicle too, although it has been taken by the Petitioner to his custody.
S.K.Parida
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SAMIR KUMAR PARIDA Designation: ADR-cum-ADDL. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Reason: Authentic Copy Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 13-Mar-2024 18:55:29
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Sections 294/420/506/34 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajesh Kumar Baral
State of Odisha
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
