Petitioners challenged an order allowing an application to begin hearing of a suit. The court noted the suit had been disposed of in 2011, rendering the writ petition infructuous, and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 03-Aug-2023 18:32:27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 8640 OF 2011
Prabhakar Moharana and another …. Petitioners
Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate
-versus-
Khetramohan Das and others
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
02.08.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous having regard to the disposal of the underlying suit
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Prabhakar Moharana
Khetramohan Das
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
