The Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for cross-examination in a civil suit as infructuous. No restoration petition had been filed, and interim orders were vacated.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 02-Aug-2023 10:28:33
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6959 OF 2011
Smrutiranjan Parida and others …. Petitioners
Mr. Jamini Kanta Bhuyan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Chittaranjan Nanda, Advocate
-versus-
…. Dinabandhu Tyagi and others Opp. Parties
Mr. Dwarika Prasad Mohanty, Advocate (For Opp. Party Nos.1,5 to 12)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
01.08.2023
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 02-Aug-2023 10:28:33
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of an application to cross-examine the Civil Court Commissioner should be allowed in the absence of a restoration petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smrutiranjan Parida
Dinabandhu Tyagi
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
