In a writ petition seeking regularization of service, the High Court of Orissa held that no direction could be issued for regularization but considered the petitioner for future vacancies based on past experience.
Petitioner considered for re-engagement in future vacancies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8299 of 2023
Gouranga Charan Mallick …. Petitioner Mr. H.S. Deo, Advocate -versus-
…. Chief Executive Officer, TPCODL, Opposite Parties Odisha, Bhubaneswar and others
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 24.03.2023
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
Jagabandhu
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge
// 2 //
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the state was directed to regularize the petitioner's past service.
Gouranga Charan Mallick
Chief Executive Officer, TPCODL
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
