Parsuram Ojha v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition filed by Parsuram Ojha was dismissed as infructuous by a Division Bench of the High Court of Odisha, vacating any prior interim orders.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4348 of 2018
Parsuram Ojha …. Petitioner M/s. Sujata Jena, Advocate & Associate
-Versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. J.P. Patra, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
07.12.2023
Order No.
03. 1. On behalf of Mrs. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner,
it is informed to the Court that the matter has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands
dismissed as being infructuous.
3. Interim order, if any, is hereby stand vacated.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Balaram Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BALARAM BEHERA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 08-Dec-2023 18:56:04
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parsuram Ojha
- respondent
State of Odisha & Others
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court