Petitioners sought court direction to sell a land share in Cuttack Sadar for family expenses. The High Court noted the prayer was misconceived regarding execution of sale deeds and dismissed the writ petition upon prayer for withdrawal by counsel.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO. 5718 OF 2023 Rabindra Nath Beura and others ….
…. Petitioners Mr. R.K. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another …. Opp. Parties
Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
20.04.2023
“It is therefore prayed that your Lordship will be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Party No.2 to allow the Petitioners to sale their share Ac.0.70 decs. 1 Kadi out of total land recorded in Khata No.102 of mouza-Bamburi in Khata No.190 of mouza-Barala in Khata No.393 under P.S. Cuttack Sadar vide Annexure-1 to 4 in order to meet their daughter’s marriage, treatment, repayment of hand loans and construction of house.
And for this act of your kindness, the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
bks
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 2 of 2
Rabindra Nath Beura and others
State of Odisha
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
