This revisional petition challenging a Family Court maintenance order was disposed of when the petitioner's counsel filed a memo withdrawing the petition. The Court dismissed the RPFAM on these grounds.
The RPFAM was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 205 OF 2017
Aswini Kumar Panda
Aswini Kumar Panda …. Petitioner Mr. Bighnesh Swain, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shashi Bhusan Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
Seema Padhi
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
20.04.2023
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revisional petition against the maintenance order be allowed or dismissed in the light of withdrawal.
Whether the prayer for withdrawal of RPFAM be accepted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Aswini Kumar Panda
Seema Padhi
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
K.R. Mohapatra
Parties & counsel
