Petitioner filed a regular appeal against a judgment of the Family Court, Khurda regarding maintenance. The Petitioner was absent, and the brief had been withdrawn. The regular appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, and an interim order was vacated.
Regular Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 162 OF 2017
Sidhartha Kumar Pradhan
…. Petitioner
None
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Sujit Kumar Pattnaik, Advocate
Swati Patsani and another
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
19.04.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow/proceed with the regular appeal against the maintenance order passed by Family Court, Khurda.
Sidhartha Kumar Pradhan
Swati Patsani
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
