This order reflects on a withdrawal prayer in a writ petition regarding dealership termination. The High Court dismissed the writ petition on withdrawal and disposed of the interim application.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim application is disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) NO.4735 OF 2017
Basanti Parida @ Mohapatra
…. Petitioner
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pati, Advocate -versus-
…. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Opp. Parties and another
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
23.11.2023
I.A. No. 18415 of 2023
2 . The Petitioner in this writ petition prays for a direction to set aside the letter dated 21st February, 2017 (Annexure-9), whereby dealership agreement with the Petitioner was terminated with immediate effect.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
bks
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BIJAY KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 24-Nov-2023 11:30:37
Page 1 of 1
Basanti Parida @ Mohapatra
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
K.R. Mohapatra
Bijay Kumar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
