High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition seeking challenge to an order rejecting an interim relief application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC due to non-prosecution by the petitioner's counsel. An interim order was also vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Nov-2023 12:19:14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 13536 OF 2011
Kedareswar Samantaray …. Petitioner Ms. Manisha Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.S. Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
The Managing Director (Finance) CESCO Ltd. and another
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. Debendra Kumar Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
22.11.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kedareswar Samantaray
The Managing Director (Finance) CESCO Ltd.
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
