M/S.Mangturam Shyamsundar v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for nonprosecution as counsel for the petitioner submitted no instruction in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4082 of 2017
M/s. Mangturam Shyam Sundar . ..……. Petitioner
Ms. Z. Wallace, Advocate on instruction of Mr. Sumit Lal, Advocate -Versus-
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Banijya Kar Bhawan, Cuttack & others ..……. Opp. Parties
Order No. 01.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 06.04.2023 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Ms. Z. Wallace, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Mr. Sumit Lal, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a memorandum has been filed stating that the counsel does not have any instruction in the matter.
3. In view of this, this writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
Subhasis
2
3
M/s. Mangturam Shyam Sundar
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Banijya Kar Bhawan, Cuttack
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court