The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition filed to challenge the rejection of an application under Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC. The court held the petition infructuous as evidence had already been recorded.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 25-Aug-2023 15:18:34
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 32095 OF 2011
Mangaraj Prusty and others
Petitioners
None
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Ms. P.S. Mohanty, Advocate on behalf of Mr. J. Pradhan, Advocate
Bhagaban Prusty and others
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
24.08.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
Mangaraj Prusty and others
Bhagaban Prusty and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
