This order set aside an impugned order of intervention in a suit that allowed the impleadment of Opposite Party No.8 under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C., following the party’s withdrawal of that application during the hearing of the writ petition filed against the order.
The impugned order allowing impleadment was set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO. 32195 OF 2011
Biramitra Club …. Petitioner
Mr. Rama Kanta Mohanty, Senior Advocate being assisted by Ms. Sumitra Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel (For Opp. Party Nos. 1 to 4) Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate (For Opp. Party No.8)
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER 23.08.2023
Order No.
W.P.(C) NO. 32195 OF 2011
& I.A. NO. OF 2023
2 . This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 4th November, 2011 (Annexure-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sundargarh in C.S. No. 14 of 2005, whereby an application filed by Opposite Party No.8 under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. to implead him as a party to the suit has been allowed.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
bks
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BIJAY KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 24-Aug-2023 11:20:42
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order allowing impleadment of Opposite Party No.8 should be set aside when the party withdraws the application.
How to dispose of the writ petition and the interim application filed during hearing.
Biramitra Club
State of Odisha
Opposite Party No.8
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
