Bahuda Mallik v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court held that the order assailed was appealable under the OPDR Act, 1962. It directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the Additional District Magistrate within three weeks, maintaining the interim order until disposal.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file an appeal before the Additional District Magistrate within three weeks; interim order continued until disposal of the appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24722 of 2014
Bahuda Mallik …. Petitioner
Mr.Janmejaya Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr.N.K.Praharaj, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 14.03.2023
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the order assailed is an appealable order under the OPDR Act, 1962.
Whether the petitioner was required to approach the appellate authority instead of filing a writ petition.
Whether the interim order should continue till the disposal of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bahuda Mallik
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
A.K. MOHAPATRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court