The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as infructuous without entering into a detailed controversy, after counsel accepted that the subject matter had become moot due to the passage of time.
Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.2267 of 2012
Manikeswari Food Products (P) …. Petitioner Ltd. Kalahandi
Mr.H.S.Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties Mr.A.K.Mishra, Advocate for O.P.No.1
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 14.03.2023
// 2 //
interim order was extended from time to time. Mr.H.S.Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner further contended that during pendency of the Writ Petition the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous as in the meantime the paddy stock has already been milled and supplied to the Opposite Parties along with milling bill.
RKS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking interim stay had become infructuous due to pendency and change in facts.
Manikeswari Food Products (P) Ltd.
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
