The Court dismissed a writ petition filed by President of a vending zone seeking restraint on utility supply to other shopkeepers. The Court held the dispute involves contractual terms and requires civil court adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 2012 of 2023
Bijaya Kumar Nanda
…. Petitioner Mr. P.C.Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 04.04.2023
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
s.s.satapathy
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a mandate to restrain provision of electricity connections violates fundamental rights, or whether the dispute requires adjudication by a civil court.
Bijaya Kumar Nanda
State of Odisha
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
