This order dismisses a Regular Petition for Ancillary Maintenance as withdrawn by the petitioner who filed a memo before the High Court of Orissa seeking withdrawal of the proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 50 of 2017
Gangadhar Rout
…. Petitioner Mr. S.Nath, Advocate
-versus-
Sangita Rout
…. Opp. Party
Mr. Sangramjit Panda, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 04.04.2023
s.s.satapathy
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a filing of a withdrawal memo justifies dismissal of a regular petition for ancillary maintenance.
Gangadhar Rout
Sangita Rout
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
