The RPFAM was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear. An interim order was vacated. No substantive ruling on the maintenance application itself was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 91 OF 2016
Bipin Bihari Swain …. Petitioner None
-versus-
Puspanjali Swain and another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
03.04.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
Bipin Bihari Swain
Puspanjali Swain
Another
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
