Single judge disposed of a writ petition challenging an order allowing a plaint withdrawal and substituting a fresh suit. The court found the matter infructuous as the liberty granted was not acted upon, leaving nothing to adjudicate.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Nov-2023 17:53:52
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 18960 OF 2011
K. Santosh Ku. Senapaty and another …. Petitioners Mr. Suvendu Kar, Advocate
on behalf of
Mr. Ajodhya Ranjan Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Sibaram Patra
…. Opp. Party
Mr. Saibrata Rath, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A.K. Rout, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
24.11.2023
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Nov-2023 17:53:52
impugned herein has become a withdrawal of the suit simplicitor.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
ms
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging a civil order stands disposed of as infructuous since the liberty granted to file a fresh suit was not acted upon.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Santosh Ku. Senapaty
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
