The petitioner, represented by counsel, had no instructions in the matter. The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 17052 of 2017
Mahamaya Thakurani Bije Nija Gaon …. Petitioner
M/s. Trilochan Barik, Advocate & Associates
-versus-
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty Additional Government Advocate for State
State of Odisha and others
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No. 15.03.2023
02. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that he has no
instructions in the matter.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
S. Behera
Mahamaya Thakurani Bije Nija Gaon
State of Odisha
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
