The High Court of Orissa set aside the impugned order dismissing W.P.(C) No.19803 of 2020 on procedural grounds, as the Appellant was not given an opportunity to file a counter affidavit. The writ petition was listed for fresh hearing.
Impugned order set aside; W.P.(C) No.19803 of 2020 listed for fresh hearing on 03.07.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 122 of 2021
Chairman, Hinjilicut RMC …. Appellant
Mr. B.S. Tripathy-1, Advocate
-versus-
…. Kumuda Chandra Satapathy and Respondents Another
Mr. Subham Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
15.03.2023
Page 1 of 2
on or before 26th June, 2023 and the Respondents herein who are the writ Petitioners will file rejoinder affidavit thereto before 3rd July, 2023. No further time will be granted for this purpose. The learned Single Judge in the roster Bench is requested to proceed with the hearing of the writ petition on merits and endeavour to dispose it of as expeditiously as possible.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(G. Satapathy)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the writ petition should be set aside because the Appellant was denied an opportunity to file a counter affidavit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mayadhar Pradhan v. State of OdishaReferred¶13
W.P.(C) No.8608 of 2010 (Mayadhar Pradhan v. State of Odisha)
Chairman, Hinjilicut RMC
Kumuda Chandra Satapathy
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
