A contempt petition was disposed of as it did not survive the order passed in a related warrant application.
The contempt petition is disposed of as it does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 216 of 2022
Kumuda Chandra Sathpathy and …. Petitioners Another
Mr. Subham Sharma, Advocate
-versus-
Nilamadhab Bhoi, Sub Collector …. Opposite Parties Chhatrapur-cum-Chairman and Others
Mr. M.K. Khuntia, Addl. Govt. Advocate
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER 15.03.2023
Order No.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (G. Satapathy) Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
Kumuda Chandra Sathpathy
Nilamadhab Bhoi
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
