The Court disposed of a writ petition filed for regularization of service. It directed the concerned authority to consider the petitioner's representation within two months and pass a reasoned order without expressing an opinion on merits.
Direction to the Opposite Party No.7 to consider the petitioner's representation and pass a reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.16020 of 2023
Sri Tankadhar Meher
…. Petitioner
Ms. Jyotsnamayee Rath, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Saswat Das, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
21.06.2023
“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon’ble court to allow this petition
AND
Further be pleased to a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s)/order(s) directions to the OPS to regularize the service of the petitioner on the basis of the judgment of Supreme Court reported in AIR 2006 SC 1806 Judgment of Uma Devi and A.I.R. 2010 SC 2587 of Judgment of M.L. Kesari.
AND
// 2 //
writ(s)/direction(s)/order(s) as this Hon’ble court deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
( A.K. Mohapatra)
Signature Not Verified Debasis
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: PA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC CUTTACK Date: 22-Jun-2023 20:35:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization of service based on Supreme Court judgments.
Sri Tankadhar Meher
State of Odisha
A.K. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
