Writ petition concerning the final selection list for GRS engagement. Court disposed of the matter by directing the Project Director DRDA to consider the Petitioner's pending representation within six weeks.
Directed Opposite Party (Project Director) to consider pending Petitioner representation within six weeks and pass a reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.12610 of 2023
Priyanka Swain …. Petitioner
Mr.Saroj Kumar Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr.H.K.Panigrahi, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
13.06.2023
“ It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ Application, notice be issued to the Opp.Parties to show cause as to why the final selection list under annexure-11 for engagement of GRS shall not be quashed, if they fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, issue writ to engage the Petitioner in the post of GRS in the district of Malkangiri under Annexure-1;
And pass appropriate writ/writs, any other order/orders, direction/directions be issued a this Hon’ble Court thinks just and proper;”
// 2 //
Anil
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Vacation Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANIL KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 19-Jun-2023 14:55:59
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the statutory representative submission by the Petitioner regarding her grievance in the GRS recruitment should be considered.
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
