The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner's counsel informed the court of having no instruction to proceed with the matter challenging an order rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and an interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.14657 OF 2012 Bipin Behari Pandey …. Petitioner
Mr. Surya N. Satapathy, Advocate
-versus-
Ilishaba Sahu and another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
28.08.2023
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Signature Not Verified
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Rojalin Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 29-Aug-2023 19:50:43
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution when counsel inform the court of having no instruction.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bipin Behari Pandey
Ilishaba Sahu
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
