The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as no petitioner appeared to pursue the matter challenging an order rejecting an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 29-Aug-2023 19:51:16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 13784 OF 2012
Sudhir Kumar Mallik and others
…. Petitioners
None
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Pramod Kumar Swain, Advocate (For Opp. Party Nos.1 & 3)
Rangadhar Hota and others
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
28.08.2023
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC can be disposed of due to non-appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sudhir Kumar Mallik and others
Rangadhar Hota and others
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
