submitted that despite orders of this Court in W.P.(C) Nos.10101 and 25755 of 2021 under Annexures 2 and 3 respectively, it has not yielded any result, inasmuch as, opposite party No.4 initiated action for eviction. It is contended that without proper inquiry and providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, who are issued with the Dafayati Rights Certificates and in possession of the schedule lands, impugned action has been contemplated. It is claimed that an inquiry was conducted pursuant to the order in W.P.(C) No. 10101 of 2021 by a team led by opposite party No. 3, which reached at a conclusion that the petitioners are no more financially unsound. Furthermore, it is submitted that a report was received by opposite party No.4 to the effect that the economic productivity of cashew nut plantation is about 20 years and in the meantime, already 40 years have elapsed and therefore, such productivity has been entirely lost and with such a conclusion, the opposite parties have taken a decision to evict them which is unjust, arbitrary and illegal, more so when, no opportunity of hearing was provided by the team which held so under the authority of opposite party No.3. So therefore, according to Mr. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the petitioners, the opposite parties and in particular, opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 should be directed not to evict them without following due process of law.
